We all have different personalities, but are some more rare than others? And why do we find the idea of rare personality types so intriguing anyway? Oftentimes, these types seem a bit mysterious or hard to understand. Or maybe there’s something special about having characteristics that not everyone possesses.
Having one of the rarest personality types can also come with challenges. When a personality type makes up only 1-2% of the population, people with these traits might feel like they don’t quite fit in. They may be unique, but that can also be a strength.
Personality psychology has long sought to categorize human behavior and preferences into various “types.” Some researchers focus on trait-based models like the Big Five, which measure personality along continuous spectrums.
Other models use a type-based approach, like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). These personality typologies have remained popular with the public.
It’s difficult to determine exactly which personality types are the rarest. According to estimates from the Myers & Briggs Foundation, certain MBTI personality types—such as INFJ and INTJ—are significantly rarer than others, making up just a small fraction of the global population.
Of course, personality is complex. Researchers continue to debate the validity and usefulness of these kinds of personality typing systems. Despite this, it’s hard to deny the popularity and appeal of these personality theories. People often utilize them to better understand themselves and others. This is especially true for those who might feel different from others.
In this article, we’ll explore the rarest personality types, what makes them unique, and how they navigate a world designed for more common traits.
How Personality Types Are Classified
Psychologists have introduced a number of different frameworks to categorize personality. Each one has its own strengths and limitations.
Type-based models like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) tend to be the most popular with people interested in learning more about their personality.
However, most psychological research relies on trait-based models such as the Big Five Personality Traits (OCEAN model).
Trait-Based vs. Type-Based Models
Trait-based models, like the Big Five, describe personality along five continuous dimensions:
- Openness to experience (curious vs. cautious)
- Conscientiousness (organized vs. spontaneous)
- Extraversion (outgoing vs. reserved)
- Agreeableness (compassionate vs. competitive)
- Neuroticism (emotionally reactive vs. stable)
Each of these broad traits exists on a spectrum. That means you can be high, low, or somewhere in the middle for each dimension. For example, a person can be mildly introverted or extremely conscientious instead of just fitting neatly into a single category.
Research also backs up the Big Five models’ predictive power. Evidence suggests it can be used to predict job performance, relationship satisfaction, and mental health outcomes.
In contrast, type-based models, such as MBTI, categorize individuals into 16 distinct personality types based on four dichotomies:
These categories are designed to offer insights into a person’s natural tendencies and preferences. While the MBTI is widely used in workplaces and personal development, some psychologists critique its lack of scientific rigor, particularly its reliance on binary, either/or, classifications rather than spectrums.
Despite these concerns, the MBTI remains a highly influential and widely used tool, particularly for people who are trying to understand themselves better.
Why Are Some Personality Types Rarer Than Others?
Personality types are influenced by a combination and interaction of biological, environmental, and cultural factors.
For example, studies suggest that personality traits have a genetic basis, with twin studies estimating heritability rates of around 40-60% for major personality traits.
Cultural norms can also play a big part in which traits are more common. For example, societies that prioritize structure and tradition may produce more Judging (J) types, while those that encourage exploration and adaptability may see more Perceiving (P) types.
Although personality is shaped by both nature and nurture, some combinations of traits—such as high introversion, strong intuition, and long-term strategic thinking—tend to be less common in the general population.
The Rarest Personality Types (According to MBTI)
While personality exists on a spectrum, some combinations of traits are significantly less common than others. Based on estimates from the Myers & Briggs Foundation and other MBTI research, the rarest personality types make up only 1-3% of the population.
These types tend to have complex inner worlds, strong convictions, and a deep sense of purpose, which may make them feel different from those around them.
INFJ (“The Advocate”) – 1-2% of the Population
Traits: Visionary, introspective, deeply empathetic, values meaning and purpose.
INFJs are often described as idealistic and strategic. They have a strong sense of emotional intelligence and long-term planning skills. They are introspective, but they also have a deep desire to help other people and make the world a better place.
Research suggests that individuals with high introversion (I) and intuition (N) tend to process information deeply, making them more likely to engage in careers or personal pursuits focused on personal growth and social change (Furnham, 1996).
Why Are INFJs So Rare?
INFJs embody a paradox—they are highly sensitive and emotional yet logical and structured. This rare balance of traits makes them unique, as most people tend to lean either toward emotional expressiveness (Feeling) or logical detachment (Thinking).
Famous INFJs: Carl Jung (the founder of analytical psychology), Eleanor Roosevelt, and Taylor Swift (according to public MBTI assessments).
INTJ (“The Mastermind”) – 1-2% of the Population
Traits: Strategic, independent, analytical, values competence and efficiency.
INTJs are known for their highly structured thinking, independence, and long-term vision. They thrive on intellectual challenges and often prefer working alone or in leadership roles where they can implement their ideas efficiently.
A study on cognitive processing styles found that individuals who score high in intuitive (N) and thinking (T) traits are more likely to engage in abstract reasoning and strategic planning.
Why Are INTJs So Rare?
Most people either prefer structure (Judging) or adaptability (Perceiving), but INTJs possess both strong structure and a future-oriented vision, making them a statistical outlier.
Famous INTJs: Isaac Newton, and Jane Austen (according to MBTI analyses).
ENTP (“The Debater”) – 2-3% of the Population
Traits: Quick-witted, innovative, thrives on debate, challenges authority.
ENTPs are energetic, spontaneous, and love intellectual challenges. They often excel in fields that require creativity, adaptability, and problem-solving, such as entrepreneurship, media, or law.
Why Are ENTPs So Rare?
While extraverts are common, most prefer structured environments and social harmony. ENTPs, however, question norms and challenge ideas, making them less conventional in their social interactions.
Famous ENTPs: Mark Twain, Richard Feynman, and Tom Hanks (based on MBTI interpretations).
These rare personality types stand out due to their uncommon blend of traits, which often makes them natural leaders, deep thinkers, or creative problem-solvers. However, being rare can come with its own challenges.
Factors That Influence Personality
Personality traits are shaped by genetics, environment, and cultural influences, but why do some personality types occur less frequently than others? Research in behavioral genetics, neuroscience, and cross-cultural psychology offers some clues.
Genetic and Biological Influences
Research suggests that personality is influenced by both genetics and environmental factors, with heredity playing a significant role in shaping who we are.
Studies on twins estimate that genetic factors contribute to about 40-60% of personality differences.
Some personality types may be naturally less common due to the cognitive processes they rely on. For example, highly introspective and abstract-thinking individuals might have brain structures that differ from those of more common personality types.
Evolutionary and Cultural Factors
Personality traits have evolved based on their advantages in different environments. Some traits are more widespread because they historically contributed to survival and social cohesion. For instance:
- Extraversion is common because social bonding and cooperation have traditionally increased survival odds.
- Practical, present-focused thinking is often favored because it aligns with real-world problem-solving and adaptability.
More independent and introspective personality types, which may not align as strongly with dominant social structures, are naturally less common. Cultural influences also shape personality prevalence, as certain traits are reinforced or discouraged in different societies.
Cognitive Preferences and Statistical Rarity
Personality differences can are also influenced by different styles of cognitive processing. Some cognitive approaches are simply less common than others.
- People who rely on deep, abstract thinking tend to be rarer. For instance, people who rely on intuition and independent analysis may be less common than those who use concrete, detail-focused thinking.
- People who come up with ideas quickly and question the status quo might stand out in settings where there’s a bit of emphasis on structure and routine.
Because these cognitive styles are less common, the personality types that rely on them are also less frequent.
Challenges and Strengths of Rare Personality Types
Being part of a rare personality group comes with both benefits and difficulties. These people often bring unique perspectives and innovative ideas but also often face challenges in social interactions, career paths, or relationships.
Challenges:
- Feeling misunderstood or isolated: Uncommon ways of thinking can make it harder to find like-minded individuals, sometimes leading to feelings of loneliness or frustration.
- Difficulty finding the right career fit: Many workplaces prioritize teamwork and conventional methods, which may not align with independent or strategic thinkers.
- Struggles with emotional expression: Highly introspective individuals may internalize their emotions rather than express them openly. This tendency can sometimes lead to stress or miscommunication.
Strengths:
- Innovative thinking and problem-solving: Uncommon personality types often see patterns and solutions that others overlook. Because of this, they are valuable in creative and strategic roles.
- Deep emotional with strong social insights: Some rare personality types excel at understanding human emotions and motivations. They often make great mentors, counselors, or leaders because of such skills.
- Determination and independence: Many rare personality types are known for being highly self-motivated and goal-oriented. They are able to successfully pursue their own visions rather than conforming to external expectations.
How to Identify Your Rare Personality Type
If you’ve ever felt like you think differently from those around you, you may have a less common personality type. Here’s how to explore and embrace your uniqueness:
Step 1: Take a Personality Assessment
While no test can fully capture the complexity of personality, assessments can offer insights into your natural tendencies. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is popular for categorizing personality types, while the Big Five Personality Test provides a research-backed approach by measuring traits on a spectrum.
Step 2: Reflect on Your Core Traits and Cognitive Style
Even without taking a test, you can explore your personality by considering questions like:
- Do you prefer deep, abstract conversations over small talk?
- Do you make decisions based on logic or emotions?
- Do you prefer structured plans or flexibility?
- Do social interactions drain you, even when you enjoy them?
If your answers align with traits often associated with rare personality types—such as deep introspection, independent thinking, and a preference for innovation—you may belong to a statistically less common group.
Step 3: Embrace Your Strengths and Adapt to Challenges
Recognize how your unique personality traits might help you thrive:
- Use your insights to mentor and support others while setting boundaries to protect your energy.
- Think strategically when it comes to leadership or innovation while also working on emotional expression.
- Stay curious, use your quick thinking, and be mindful of how your communication style affects others.
To navigate challenges:
- Seek out like-minded people in relevant communities or professional groups.
- Find career paths that match your strengths, such as roles that allow for creativity, independence, and deep thinking.
- Develop emotional resilience by recognizing that being different doesn’t mean being alone—many successful individuals throughout history had uncommon personality traits.
Step 4: Celebrate Your Uniqueness
Don’t think of having one of the rarest personality types as a disadvantage. Instead, think about how it can be a strength. Many influential thinkers, leaders, and creators have stood out precisely because they saw the world differently.
The Value of Rare Personality Types
Just because certain personality types are rare doesn’t mean they don’t play an important societal role. These individuals often use their creativity, empathy, and innovation to challenge common group norms. They drive progress and bring a whole host of fresh ideas into the world.
Understanding your personality type allows you to navigate the world on your own terms. That way, you can utilize your strengths while still meeting social and professional expectations. By embracing the things that make you unique, you can adapt and make a meaningful impact on your community.
Sources:
Allen, K. A., Kern, M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInereney, D., & Slavich, G. M. (2021). Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409
Furnham, A. (1996). The Big Five versus the Big Four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00033-5
Kang, W., Steffens, F., Pineda, S., Widuch, K., & Malvaso, A. (2023). Personality traits and dimensions of mental health. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 7091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33996-1
Kaufman, S. B., Deyoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011
McCrea S. M. (2010). Intuition, insight, and the right hemisphere: Emergence of higher sociocognitive functions. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 3, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s7935
Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.57.3.210
Power, R. A., & Pluess, M. (2015). Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants. Translational Psychiatry, 5(7), e604. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.96